The poem ‘Kidnapped’ was written in 1974 by
Ruperake Petaia. He was born on April 11 in
1951 and he is a poet and writer from Samoa who studied
at the University of the South Pacific. Western Samoa had been a German and a New
Zealand colony before they gained their independence in 1962. Eastern Samoa was
colonized by the Americans and is still an American territory.
The poem is
written in ordinary plainspoken English, a vernacular voiced poem. It is
written from the point of view of a boy, we can assume is from the pacific and
probably Petaia himself, which is taking a western education. The poem explores
themes about the effects of colonialism and Western influences on Samoan
culture and society, it voices the
perspective of the colonized and rejects the ideologies of Western imperialism.
The text is very satirical and it includes many
metaphors. The title “Kidnapped” is a metaphor for when the boy started school,
implying that the western teachers (colonists) stole him from his home and
family. The ”threats” his parents received and the “ransom fees” they paid are
metaphors for letters with bills and school tuition fee. The satire is used to
criticize the western education system. He felt like he was forced to take an
expensive western education that took him away from his culture. Petaia uses
phrases like “Mama and Papa grew poorer and poorer” and “I grew whiter and
whiter”. It expresses his frustration over
learning from the colonizers at the cost of the loss of traditional Samoan
knowledge.
He
makes references to politicians like Churchill, Garibaldi, Hitler and Mao. I
get the impression that he doesn’t feel that learning about them is relevant to
his life. But when he refers to Guevara he says “Guevara pointed a revolution
at my brains”. It could be an indication that he felt like revolutionizing
against the colonists in his own country.
In
the last paragraph of the poem he talks satirical about his “release fifteen
years after” from school to “applause from fellow victims”, referring to the
other students, with “a piece of paper certifying my release”. It sounds like
he is bitter and angry for having spent so much time in the schools and that
all he gained from it was a diploma.
The poem explores
themes about the effects of colonialism and Western influences on Samoan
culture and society, it voices the
perspective of the colonized and rejects the ideologies of Western imperialism.
One can argue that another theme is psychological colonization. The boy was
pressured to take a western education, his parents had to pay for it and the
things he learned there probably didn’t reflect his Samoan culture and
traditions. A young boy born in the pacific is pushed towards the same mindset
as the people from the west that has colonized his home, when he really wants
to learn traditional Samoan knowledge. That is a good example of psychological
colonization and marginalization of his culture.
At
last I want to mention that Petaia only focuses on the negatives of western
education, and not the positives. Although he didn’t want the education and he
feels like it took him away from his own culture, it can help him get a good
job and it provides knowledge he wouldn’t have learned without taking western
education.
Hello Gaute,
ReplyDeleteI think this is a good, thorough analysis and 'reading' of the poem - well done.
Do you think the poem offers any hope for the 'return' of the 'kidnapped'?
Esther :)
Hi, this really helped me. Find it very useful for my students. Two thumbs up
ReplyDeleteI like it, it helps me to analys the poem
ReplyDelete